NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1747MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+64%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
8192
160
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
