NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock1747MHz
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Mobile
8.945 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+23%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1747 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
6144
160
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
111.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
279.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
139.8 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
8.945 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
279.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
16 nm
Process Size
10 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
