NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (1569MHz vs 1380MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 230.9GB/s)
Lower TDP (80W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+51%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh
5.299 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
945 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
30
2560
Shading Units
1920
160
TMUs
120
64
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
