NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1569MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+703%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+366%
126
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
756 MHz
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
977 MHz
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.63 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.26 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GM107
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
