NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
2544 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+34826%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
2
2560
Shading Units
16
160
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
