NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+1759%
8.033 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1316 MHz
Base Clock
-
1569 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1804 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
230.9GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
20
SM Count
5
2560
Shading Units
240
160
TMUs
40
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
100.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
251.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
125.5 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.033 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
251.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF104
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
