NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+386%
6.48 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF110
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
