NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+530%
6.48 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
14
2048
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GF100
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
