NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1582MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 Mobile
+183%
6.48 TFLOPS
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1278 MHz
Base Clock
-
1582 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
101.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
202.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
101.2 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.480 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
202.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
N17E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
