NVIDIA Quadro P4000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 105W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P4000
+623%
5.304 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1202 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1901 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
384
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
94.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
165.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
82.88 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.304 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
165.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
105W
TDP
51W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK107
GP104-850-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
