NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro P400 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P400 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1252MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 32.06GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P400
0.641 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
+60%
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1228 MHz
Base Clock
-
1252 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
32.06GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
256
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.03 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
20.03 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
10.02 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
641.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
20.03 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
238W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF100
GP107-825-KA-A1
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
