NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 5GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile
+56%
5.53 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
320bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
2496
112
TMUs
208
64
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK110
-
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
