NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1569MHz vs 1404MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+59%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P3200 Max Q
85
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+48%
126
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
20
1792
Shading Units
2560
112
TMUs
160
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
16 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
