NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 122W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+131%
5.032 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1139 MHz
Base Clock
-
1404 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
1536
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
157.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
78.62 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.032 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
157.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
122W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
