Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
1272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3000 Mobile +13421%
3.11 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

1088 MHz
Base Clock
-
1215 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

10
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
8
80
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

58.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
97.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
48.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.110 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
97.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
G98
N17E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
65 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
12W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy