NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA RTX A6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 48GB VRAM RTX A6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX A6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 21% (1800MHz vs 1493MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 200.2GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
3.822 TFLOPS
RTX A6000
+912%
38.71 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2200
3410
RTX A6000
+420%
17742
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2200
1536
RTX A6000
+507%
9324
Blender
Quadro P2200
322
RTX A6000
+1572%
5387
OctaneBench
Quadro P2200
63
RTX A6000
+852%
600
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Oct 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
1800 MHz
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
84
1280
Shading Units
10752
80
TMUs
336
40
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
336
-
RT Cores
84
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
201.6 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
604.8 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
38.71 TFLOPS
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
38.71 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
604.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
