NVIDIA Quadro P2200 vs NVIDIA GRID K520
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 and 4GB VRAM GRID K520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2200
+66%
3.822 TFLOPS
GRID K520
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1493 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1251 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
200.2GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
10
SM Count
-
1280
Shading Units
1536
80
TMUs
128
40
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
119.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
59.72 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.822 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
119.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
