NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20m to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20m 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
1472 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
Tesla K20m
+16%
3.524 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2013
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
160bit
Memory Bus
320bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
2496
64
TMUs
208
40
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
