NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 360M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 360M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+11557%
3.031 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 360M
0.026 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
160bit
Memory Bus
64bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
2
1024
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
40
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1280 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
17W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
G86
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8M-GLM
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
80 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
