NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K120Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 512MB VRAM GRID K120Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
+829%
3.031 TFLOPS
GRID K120Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1076 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
128bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
8
SM Count
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
40
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK107
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
