Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 vs NVIDIA A10G

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 and 12GB VRAM A10G to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10G 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 16% (1710MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 140.2GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000
3.031 TFLOPS
A10G +939%
31.52 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1076 MHz
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

5GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
160bit
Memory Bus
384bit
140.2GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
8
SM Count
72
1024
Shading Units
9216
64
TMUs
288
40
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

59.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
94.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
47.36 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.52 TFLOPS
3.031 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.52 TFLOPS
94.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
985.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GP106
GPU Name
GA102
GP106-875-A1
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net