NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1291MHz vs 902MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000
+74%
5.196 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2096
Quadro K6000
+34%
2809
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+33%
1723
Quadro K6000
1292
OctaneBench
Quadro P2000 Mobile
54
Quadro K6000
+51%
82
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
797 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
902 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
-
1152
Shading Units
2880
72
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
