NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1695MHz vs 1291MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
8064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P2000 Mobile
2.974 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe
+950%
31.24 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro P2000 Mobile
231
A10 PCIe
+984%
2505
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1291 MHz
Base Clock
885 MHz
1291 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
9
SM Count
72
1152
Shading Units
9216
72
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
41.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
92.95 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
46.48 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
2.974 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
92.95 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP106
GPU Name
GA102
-
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
16 nm
Process Size
8 nm
4.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
