Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 16GB VRAM Tesla P6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (47W vs 90W)
NVIDIA Tesla P6 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1506MHz vs 1480MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Tesla P6 +225%
6.169 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro P1000
32
Tesla P6 +196%
95
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2017
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1266 MHz
Base Clock
1012 MHz
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
1506 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.38 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
192.8 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
96.38 GFLOPS
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.169 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
192.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GP104
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
GP104-995-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Board Design

47W
TDP
90W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy