NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
Lower TDP (47W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20X 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
1.894 TFLOPS
Tesla K20X
+107%
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
2688
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
47W
TDP
235W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GK110
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
