NVIDIA Quadro P1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 47W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000
+5311%
1.894 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1266 MHz
Base Clock
-
1480 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
5
SM Count
2
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
47.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
59.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.600 GTexel/s
29.60 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.894 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
35.20 GFLOPS
59.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
47W
TDP
34W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
G96
GP107-860-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
