Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile +16%
1.555 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

4
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GF110
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
3 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy