NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 3% (1569MHz vs 1519MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 96.13GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+416%
8.033 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1493 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
20
512
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GP104
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4
