NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
496 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile
+6660%
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370
0.023 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
2
512
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.440 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.880 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
40W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
G84
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
80 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
