NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1519MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (40W vs 55W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro P1000 Mobile
+268%
1.555 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2017
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Pascal-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1493 MHz
Base Clock
-
1519 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
4
SM Count
4
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
24.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
48.61 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
24.30 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1.555 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
48.61 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
40W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP107
GPU Name
GF106
N18P-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1
