NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
+10461%
2.218 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro NVS
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
1536
4
TMUs
96
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
-
-
-
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
100W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
