NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 and 48GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 300W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1100 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
7160 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1100
+105709%
22.22 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2009
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro NVS
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
11.12GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
7168
4
TMUs
448
4
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
16 KB
L2 Cache
204 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
694.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.22 TFLOPS
20.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.22 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
22.22 TFLOPS
Board Design
23W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
G98
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
65 nm
Process Size
10 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
100 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
