NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock977MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+33%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
-
977 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
