NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1215MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+211%
3.11 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M620 Mobile
27
Quadro P3000 Mobile
+107%
56
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
1088 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
