NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M620 Mobile and 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M620 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 150W)
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 3 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (1395MHz vs 977MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M620 Mobile
1 TFLOPS
GRID RTX T10 4
+899%
9.999 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Jan 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
756 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
977 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
512
Shading Units
3584
32
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
15.63 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
31.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
312.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.00 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.999 TFLOPS
31.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
312.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
