NVIDIA Quadro M600M vs NVIDIA GRID K500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M600M and 4GB VRAM GRID K500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M600M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K500 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M600M
0.673 TFLOPS
GRID K500
+240%
2.289 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
837 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.008 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
14.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
672.8 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
21.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
