NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
+565%
6.844 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
3072
Shading Units
448
192
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
247W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
