NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1687MHz vs 1114MHz)
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
6.844 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile
+26%
8.637 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M6000
+4%
5162
RTX A2000 Mobile
4917
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M6000
2415
RTX A2000 Mobile
+17%
2836
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
1215 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1687 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
3072
Shading Units
2560
192
TMUs
80
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.98 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.637 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.637 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
135.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
8 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
