NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
+1096%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
55W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
