NVIDIA Quadro M6000 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2880 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000
+1381%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
3072
Shading Units
192
192
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
213.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
