Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
2624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Lower TDP (247W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +565%
6.844 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
448
256
TMUs
56
96
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GF110
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8 billion
Transistors
3 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
247W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy