Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (226W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB +1682%
6.844 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
-
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
128
256
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
G92
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
226W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy