Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB vs NVIDIA GRID A100B

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 24GB VRAM Quadro M6000 24 GB and 48GB VRAM GRID A100B to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1114MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 317.4GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M6000 24 GB
6.844 TFLOPS
GRID A100B +102%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

988 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1114 MHz
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
317.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
108
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
6912
256
TMUs
432
96
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

106.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
285.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
6.844 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
213.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
GA100
GM200-880-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
400W
600 W
Suggested PSU
800 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
8.0
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy