Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 39% (1620MHz vs 1165MHz)
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5500 Mobile +43%
4.772 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1165 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

74.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
149.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
4.772 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
149.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy