NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
1504 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+4370%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
32
96
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
100W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
G84
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
