Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3840 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M
2.496 TFLOPS
Tesla PG503 216 +527%
15.67 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1312 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
5120
80
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
195.8 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
489.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.33 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.67 TFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.834 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy