Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M +87%
2.496 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GF110
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy