NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M
2.496 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+42%
3.553 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M4000M
+18%
2446
Quadro K5200
2072
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M4000M
+19%
1122
Quadro K5200
941
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2304
80
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK110B
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
