Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs AMD FirePro W4300

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 vs AMD FirePro W4300

We compared a Professional market GPU: 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 and a Desktop platform GPU: 4GB VRAM FirePro W4300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4300 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000 +80%
2.573 TFLOPS
FirePro W4300
1.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Dec 2015
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Professional
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
1664
Shading Units
768
104
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

49.47 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
80.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.64 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.573 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1428 GFLOPS
80.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.28 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Bonaire
GM204-850-A1
GPU Variant
Bonaire PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Board Design

120W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy