NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 165W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile
+935%
22.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
58
1024
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
165W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA103
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8
